Search This Blog

Wednesday, 8 May 2019

Caned After School

A classic Roué video
The attractive schoolgirl receives the ruler on the seat of her tight navy-blue knickers followed by several hard hand-smacks. Then down come those knickers and she is made to f etch the cane and position herself over the desk. The rod whips down onto her naked buttocks several times and then, having been told to remove her knickers completely, the poor miss has to spread her legs further apart and the punishment is resumed. Her bum cheeks wobble and her tears flow as the caning is administered with a breathtaking severity. Made to stand in the corner, hands on head and bottom on display, she is left to reflect upon what was an extremely thorough beating.
M/f; time: 15 minutes
Early Roué; hand-lettered storyboard; period clothing; anonymous spanking disciplinarian; heavy age play, the kind of film kept under the counter when these were first made. All very much in the tradition of First Week of Term, Room 2D, Half-Term Punishments, Sally’s First Lesson and more, all in further testimony of the discussion about what bottoms are for. And for us, hugely erotic.
A young, very demure brunette is bent over a school desk, her blue school knickers full screen, receiving a ruler spanking. There is no dialogue. Her desperate squirming and gasping, while she submissively accepts her punishment, creates the vintage eroticism the very foundation of the genre.
Knickers now half-mast, she unfastens her skirt and is unabashedly naked front and back before her male disciplinarian, the disembodied, soft, and intimidating voice. It is naughty, humiliating stuff, with a voyeur camera angle.
Over the desk for the cane, not hard, very intense. The disciplinarian pauses and lowers her panties a bit further from the top of her thighs — for no reason other than the embarrassing sexuality of it all, and rucks up her blouse so her free breasts touch the desk. Then the spanker caresses her bare bottom just because he can and she can’t stop it.
This phase complete, the girl stands and completely removes her knickers, then places two textbooks on the floor, 4′ apart, to stand on as markers so she bends, widening her legs about as far as possible, for a dozen more strokes, bottom full-screen. There is a pause — the books are too wide. Tears drip off her chin.
Another half-dozen strokes, and a full-frontal close-up, black abundant thatch of hair and schoolgirl breasts. Naughty stuff, maybe a far cry from the leather straps and buckles on the headmaster’s bench at Lupus, but a little Chopin etude in its contribution to CP literature. Then the traditional adolescent bare bottom is sent to the corner.
Part 1:
Part 2:

10 comments:

  1. Excellent stuff. Thank you for this one. Nothing does it for me film-wise quite like these old Roue and Blushes videos and this is, in my opinion, one of the very best. There's far more extreme stuff around, of course, but none have that very special atmosphere one finds here.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where there are young women on the premises, scenes like this should be the norm in British households.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Surprised no one else is sharing their love for this terrific little film?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is rather good though a shame she whimpers throughout. I was never caned on the bare bottom but was caned over knickers like that and we were not allow to look back "Face forward!". Her semi-naked form was certainly seen (and more) when changing for swimming etc. The neighbours next door to that house were treated to a few intriguing events audible through the walls! Judy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your response, Judy. Whilst I thoroughly respect your point of view, I have to say that I rather enjoy the young lady's whimpers and whines and all the other strange noises the cane's application seems to force from her lungs. They seem all to be of a piece with the writhing, squirming buttocks and the anguished tear-bathed facial features. Having said that I can fully appreciate how a veteran of the 'good old days' of corporal punishment in our schools might frown upon what might be regarded as an unseemly lack of self control. Certainly that "Face forward!" command resonates greatly in my imaginings.

      Very sorry but I'm a little puzzled by the second part of your message, though it all sounds very intriguing! Whose 'semi naked form' are you referring to? And what house?

      Delete
  5. What I meant was that when we changed after PE we saw our peers' marked bottoms but was never aware of bare bottom spankings. The reference to the neighbours was that when that film was made the neighbours there may have heard a few giveaway noises! It doesn't look like a studio location. Judy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the clarification, Judy. It is interesting that so many of your school friends had marked bottoms. It must have been a very strict school, perhaps even for those days. Yes, I actually think that even in the good old days, bare bottom punishment in schools would have been quite rare and a matter of some controversy even then, particularly if it were inflicted by a male. Yet it is amazing how believable it all seems when we see such depictions in spanking movies!

      An ordinary house seemed to be used in a number of Roue films, this one for instance, First Week of Term and Uncle George. Don't know if it was always in the same house. If I lived next door I think I'd have been saying "Well, I won't report it to the council so long as you let me watch!" :-) Or maybe it was a detached house. The one that we see at start of First Week of Term looks like it might be (if indeed they did film in that house).

      Delete
  6. He rightly includes her schoolgirl breasts in the punishment by gradually exposing them. It is always humiliating. It would have been nice to see more of her exposed vagina from the back view as we saw some nice frontal display.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the denuding effect of the girl's blouse being pulled up beneath her armpits during punishment is a most gratifying aspect of this film.

      I presume that making the girl remove her knickers entirely and spread her legs more widely in the bent over position was designed to afford the viewer a generous view of her nether regions from behind. Unfortunately the detail seems to get lost in the shadow and murk of the production or perhaps the film's print quality. Great film though all the same.

      Delete
    2. Yes, the great thing about the removal of the knickers to deal with the bare bottom is that the girl’s bush is necessarily exposed. Though this is part of the humiliation and they might endeavour to put their hands over these parts. However once you’ve pinned their hands high up their backs, they are distracted by the striking of their bottom target, and they writhe and kick and unknowingly give full glimpses of the vulva.
      Blushes magazine always knew to include plenty of pictures of the female bush and descriptions of it being got at and further disrespected by male hands or other parts. It is much the same with the breasts - in amongst their writhings, we get great views of their bare tits in all kinds of wonderful and contorted shapes.

      Delete